iseedeadbees: (Default)
LORD Starscream ([personal profile] iseedeadbees) wrote2016-05-30 12:11 am
Entry tags:

thisavrou IC inbox

I
N
B
O
X



IC Voice Mail

"((OH MAN HERE'S SOME PLACE HOLDER TEXT HOLY SHIT))"

Mun Contact


onlytwoexpressions: (Magnus sleepy)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
For someone who likes to hold all the cards, you're surprisingly narrow-minded when you don't have the upper hand.

Or have you forgotten that you're currently speaking with someone who actively knows what it's like to have no cards, and yet somehow managed to make the best of a situation?

That's what we all are, Starscream. Survivors. You happen to be surrounded by a group of Cybertronians that have managed to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds.
onlytwoexpressions: (Well you see...)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
That sounds more like Starscream.

Clearly, you just need to find a way to circumvent the one person who has all of the cards.
onlytwoexpressions: (Gonna be so much fffffff....)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
So, there is a 'him.'

I suspected as much.
onlytwoexpressions: (Duly appointed enforcer of the yadda yad)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
I'm making it my concern.

Blackmailing a political official is very, very illegal.
onlytwoexpressions: (Have a lecture)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
And I don't see how our laws necessarily interfere with the way they run things on this ship.

The fact remains, Starscream, that there is likely a way things can end amicably.

But the cloak and dagger routine needs to end. If you want people to respect you, then you need to operate under a full disclosure mindset.
onlytwoexpressions: (Duly appointed enforcer of the yadda yad)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
Because I'm Ultra Magnus.

[He says this as dryly as possible. Seriously, Starscream. He defended Megatron against Prowl.]
onlytwoexpressions: (that's a lot of fuckwords)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
I find statements starting with 'It was an accident' most commonly end in something tragic.

Go on.
onlytwoexpressions: (But then who was phone?!)

Re: [ACTION] 1/2

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
[What.]
onlytwoexpressions: (That's a terrible idea)

Re: [ACTION] 2/2

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
...So, allow me to get this straight.

An innocuous mistake shatters Ratchet's spark chamber, instantly killing him.

Which is witnessed by the second Starscream.

Who is, in turn, blackmailing you, seizing upon a moment of weakness to potentially usurp your power?

[A pause.]

Starscream, I have been an enforcer of the law for longer than I care to remember. I've arrested people for believing, without hesitation, that they were a sparkeater. I've seen bots claim to be Mortilus himself go on killing sprees in his name.

And yet, the very premise of 'Starscream blackmails Startscream' is quite possibly the most fitting use of the term 'poetic justice' I've ever heard.

I'm being quite literal here. As a lawman, I don't think there is anything I could possibly do to punish you. It's like staring into the event horizon of treachery.
onlytwoexpressions: (Just the facts please)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
So, he's doing this for fun.

So...let me ask you this. What's stopping you from confessing openly?
onlytwoexpressions: (I am forwarding it in triplicate to your)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
Starscream, you expect trust but you offer none in return. If you openly confess, you take away all of the power the other Starscream has over you. He can't blackmail you if you have no secrets.

In fact, it's literally the last thing the other you would expect. What better way to gain the upper hand?

Ratchet himself hasn't made an issue over this, presumably because he understands you had no malicious intent.

And with no intent, you cannot be charged for a crime. That's just the basics of criminal justice: A conviction cannot be handed down unless intent can be proven.
onlytwoexpressions: (Who keeps using up all of my minutes?!)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 05:59 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying you have to divulge everything.

But, if it helps, I'm prepared to stand with you in solidarity.

Provided you properly apologize to Ratchet.
onlytwoexpressions: (What do?)

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions 2016-08-28 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Then what have you got to lose by coming clean and being honest with the rest of us?

Ratchet forgave you.

Even I can recognize the lack of intent. You're so hellbent on not giving an inch, that you're actually playing to the other Starscream's tune. The tune you originally wrote.

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 19:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 20:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 20:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 21:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 22:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 22:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-28 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-29 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-29 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-29 14:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-30 22:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: [ACTION]

[personal profile] onlytwoexpressions - 2016-08-30 22:42 (UTC) - Expand